Regulation of ribonuclease III processing by double-helical sequence antideterminants

The double helix is a ubiquitous feature of RNA molecules and provides a target for nucleases involved in RNA maturation and decay. Escherichia coli ribonuclease III participates in maturation and decay pathways by site-specifically cleaving double-helical structures in cellular and viral RNAs. The site of cleavage can determine RNA functional activity and half-life and is specified in part by local tertiary structure elements such as internal loops. The involvement of base pair sequence in determining cleavage sites is unclear, because RNase III can efficiently degrade polymeric double-stranded RNAs of low sequence complexity. An alignment of RNase III substrates revealed an exclusion of specific Watson–Crick bp sequences at defined positions relative to the cleavage site. Inclusion of these “disfavored” sequences in a model substrate strongly inhibited cleavage in vitro by interfering with RNase III binding. Substrate cleavage also was inhibited by a 3-bp sequence from the selenocysteine-accepting tRNASec, which acts as an antideterminant of EF-Tu binding to tRNASec. The inhibitory bp sequences, together with local tertiary structure, can confer site specificity to cleavage of cellular and viral substrates without constraining the degradative action of RNase III on polymeric double-stranded RNA. Base pair antideterminants also may protect double-helical elements in other RNA molecules with essential functions.

Ethidium-dependent uncoupling of substrate binding and cleavage by Escherichia coli ribonuclease III

Ethidium bromide (EB) is known to inhibit cleavage of bacterial rRNA precursors by Escherichia coli ribonuclease III, a dsRNA-specific nuclease. The mechanism of EB inhibition of RNase III is not known nor is there information on EB-binding sites in RNase III substrates. We show here that EB is a reversible, apparently competitive inhibitor of RNase III cleavage of small model substrates in vitro. Inhibition is due to intercalation, since (i) the inhibitory concentrations of EB are similar to measured EB intercalation affinities; (ii) substrate cleavage is not affected by actinomycin D, an intercalating agent that does not bind dsRNA; (iii) the EB concentration dependence of inhibition is a function of substrate structure. In contrast, EB does not strongly inhibit the ability of RNase III to bind substrate. EB also does not block substrate binding by the C-terminal dsRNA-binding domain (dsRBD) of RNase III, indicating that EB perturbs substrate recognition by the N-terminal catalytic domain. Laser photocleavage experiments revealed two ethidium-binding sites in the substrate R1.1 RNA. One site is in the internal loop, adjacent to the scissile bond, while the second site is in the lower stem. Both sites consist of an A-A pair stacked on a CG pair, a motif which apparently provides a particularly favorable environment for intercalation. These results indicate an inhibitory mechanism in which EB site-specifically binds substrate, creating a cleavage-resistant complex that can compete with free substrate for RNase III. This study also shows that RNase III recognition and cleavage of substrate can be uncoupled and supports an enzymatic mechanism of dsRNA cleavage involving cooperative but not obligatorily linked actions of the dsRBD and the catalytic domain.